24.10.2021
Головна » 2021 » Сентябрь » 29 » The Church's Position On Taking The Mandated Injections
16:56
The Church's Position On Taking The Mandated Injections

The Church's Position On Taking The Mandated Injections

Question by a Reader:

"What is your view on the Morality and safety and based on what deposit of the Faith has been left to us, what you would view as the Church's position on taking the mandated (forced) injections that are still in testing phase and not approved by the FDA as yet and may never be. Let alone the Fetal Cell Lines that they all are derived from. To me it is down to my conscience. It is also a matter of human sovereignty to me under God."

Answer:

Dear reader, answering your question I especially will emphasize on the Catholic teaching about the murder of human fetuses and also on very reverential attitude towards the human bodies as the dwelling-place of the soul.

Also, I will refer to scientists who agree that Covid-19 is comparable to SARS-CoV and no more dangerous, and there is no Covid-19 pandemic.

I will also quote an essential part of a document issued by “The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith” of the Novus Ordo church.

A few quotes from Pastoral Medicine published in 1905 with the Imprimatur of Bishop JOHN M. FARLEY, Archbishop of New York, will be presented as well.

Liberty

Pope Leo XIII,
Encyclical Letter Libertas Praestantissimum, June 20, 1888:

“LIBERTY, the highest of natural endowment, being the portion only of intellectual or rational natures, confers on man this dignity - that he is in the hand of his counsel and has power over his actions. But the manner in which such dignity is exercised is of the greatest moment, inasmuch as on the use that is made of liberty the highest good and the greatest evil alike depend. Man, indeed, is free to obey his reason, to seek moral good, and to strive unswervingly after his last end. Yet he is free also to turn aside to all other things; and, in pursuing the empty semblance of good, to disturb rightful order and to fall headlong into the destruction which he has voluntarily chosen.” p. 135
“Lastly, there remain those who, while they do not approve the separation of Church and State, think nevertheless that the Church ought to adapt herself to the times and conform to what is required by the modern system of government. Such an opinion is sound, if it is to be understood of some equitable adjustment consistent with truth and justice; in so far, namely, that the Church, in the hope of some great good, may show herself indulgent, and may conform to the times in so far as her sacred office permits. But it is not so in regard to practices and doctrines which a perversion of morals and a warped judgment have unlawfully introduced. Religion, truth, and justice, must ever be maintained; and, as God has intrusted these great and sacred matters to the care of the Church, she can never be so unfaithful to her office as to dissemble in regard to what is false or unjust, or to connive at what is hurtful to religion." pp. 160-161 [1]

A subject is not a slave

"A limit is assigned to the secular power, and the State is not an embodiment of a deity. There is a sphere of human action over which decrees of the Senate and imperial orders have no control. A subject is not a slave; in what constitutes the true dignity of his personality he is free and responsible to God alone." (CATHOLIC MORAL TEACHING AND ITS ANTAGONISTS, BY JOSEPH MAUSBACH, D.D. PROFESSOR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MUNSTER, pp. 338-339) [10]

We have no Covid-19 pandemic

A huge number of microbiologists, virologists, immunologists, pulmonologists, epidemiologists, infectious disease specialists and urgent care physicians over the world say that mortality rate from Covid-19 intentionally exaggerated by authorities, while mortality rate and serious side effects from the synthetic mRNA and Viral Vector "vaccines" intentionally underreported by authorities or not reported at all.

Based on their own practical research and experience for almost two years now, these doctors responsibly declare that the mortality rate from Covid-19 is lower than 1%, i.e. we have no pandemic. All these doctors agree that SARS-CoV-2 is similar to SARS-CoV and and that symptoms caused by SARS-CoV-2 can be successfully treated with existing antiviral drugs, or disappear on their own under the influence of antibodies produced by the human body, that is, through natural immunity; therefore, neither lockdowns nor vaccinations are needed.

Here are the names of some scientists and medical practitioners who held this view 1.5 years ago:

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, microbiologist (Germany) - "Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi zu Covid 19", April 22, 2020,
Dr. Joel Kettner, surgeon, epidemiologist (Canada) – CBC Radio cuts off expert when he questions Covid19 narrative, March 17, 2020,
Dr. John Ioannidis, physician-scientist (USA) – “A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data”, Stat News, March 17, 2020,
Dr. Yoram Lass, physician, researcher, scientist (Israel) - Interview by Globes, March 22, 2020,
Dr. Pietro Vernazza, infectionist (Switzerland) - Interview by St. Galler Tagblatt, March 22, 2020,
Frank Ulrich Montgomery, radiologist (Germany) - Interview by General Anzeiger, March 18, 2020,
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, pulmonologist, former chairman of The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Committee (PACE) (Germany) - "How Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg Sees the Current Corona Pandemic", Global Research, March 24, 2020,
Professor Hendrik Streeck, HIV researcher, epidemiologist, professor for virology (Germany) - Interview by Frankfurter Allgemeine, March 16, 2020,
Dr. Yanis Roussel, infectionist (France) - “SARS-CoV-2: fear versus data”, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, March 19, 2020,
Dr. David Katz, physician, nutrition science, preventive medicine (USA) - “Is Our Fight Against Coronavirus Worse Than the Disease?” New York Times, March 20, 2020,
Michael T. Osterholm, infectious disease epidemiologist (USA) - “Facing Covid-19 reality: A national lock down is no cure”, Washington Post, March 21, 2020,
Dr. Peter Goetzsche, physician, medical researcher, science in biology and chemistry (Denmark) – “Corona: an epidemic of mass panic, Deadly Medicines”, March 21, 2020,
Dr. Daniel Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi from Accelerated Urgent Care (USA) - press conference, Bakersfield, CA, April 22, 2020,
Professor Detlef Krüger, the direct predecessor of the well-known German virologist Christian Drosten at the Charité Clinic in Berlin (Germany) - Drosten-Vorgänger Krüger: „Corona nicht gefährlicher als Grippe“ - Exklusiv, April 25, 2020,
Professor Johan Giesecke, the former Swedish and European chief epidemiologist (Sweden) - „Lockdown verschiebt Tote in die Zukunft“, April 25, 2020.


Also, here are main theses from Andreas Radbruch and Hyun-Dong Chang’s studies A Long-term Perspective On Immunity to COVID*

"Determining the duration of protective immunity to infection by SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for understanding and predicting the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical studies now indicate that immunity will be long-lasting."

"Generating immunity against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is of the utmost importance for bringing the COVID-19 pandemic under control, protecting vulnerable individuals from severe disease and limiting viral spread. Our immune systems protect against SARSCoV- 2 either through a sophisticated reaction to infection or in response to vaccination."

"About 25 years ago, it became evident that plasma cells can become memory cells themselves, and can secrete antibodies for long-lasting protection. Memory plasma cells can be maintained for decades, if not a lifetime, in the bone marrow."

"This is not unexpected, given that immune memory to many viruses and vaccines is stable over decades, if not for a lifetime.

For SARS-CoV, a coronavirus very like SARS-CoV-2 that was originally identified in 2003 and causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), the continued presence of high concentrations of neutralizing antibodies in blood serum for more than 17 years was reported in 2020. Wang and colleagues’ results suggest that long-term immunity might also be expected for SARS-CoV-2. The authors report a follow-up investigation of serum antibodies and memory B cells specific for SARS-CoV-2 approximately one year after infection. The individuals studied had previously been analyzed by Wang and colleagues’ group after six months, but it is only now, after a year, that the transition from an acute immune reaction to the generation of immunological memory has become evident.

Wang et al. show that, between 6 and 12 months after infection, the concentration of neutralizing antibodies remains unchanged. That the acute immune reaction extends even beyond six months is suggested by the authors’ analysis of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory B cells in the blood of the convalescent individuals over the course of the year. These memory B cells continuously enhance the reactivity of their SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies through a process known as somatic hypermutation. The authors demonstrated this with in vitro tests of antibody neutralization of a broad collection of SARS-CoV-2 variant strains."

"The good news is that the evidence thus far predicts that infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces long-term immunity in most individuals."

*Andreas Radbruch and Hyun-Dong Chang are at the German Rheumatism Research Centre Berlin (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Berlin 10117, Germany. Scientific Director: Prof. Andreas Radbruch.

The German Rheumatism Research Center Berlin (DRFZ) focuses on the biomedical and epidemiological analyses of rheumatic diseases. It combines biological, clinical and epidemiologic research to improve treatment of rheumatic patients.


This article was published online on 14 June 2021.

Doctors Andreas Radbruch and Hyun-Dong Chang agree that it has become evident that the natural human immune system is able to protect against Covid-19 infection for decades, if not for a lifetime.

A very interesting fact about Olga Golubovska, Kyiv, Ukraine - Ukrainian Infectious Diseases Specialist, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Honored Doctor of Ukraine, Head of the Department of Infectious Diseases of the Bogomolets National Medical University. She agrees with Andreas Radbruch that the human immune system is able to protect against Covid-19 infection for decades, if not for a lifetime. BUT despite this, she strongly recommends to all people who have not yet had Covid-19 and even those who have already were sick with Covid-19 taking injections with either mRNA or Viral Vector "vaccines". IN THE SAME TIME, she herself categorically refuses to accept these “vaccines” under the pretext that more than a year ago she was already sick with Covid-19 and after recovery she has enough natural antibodies that very reliably protect her from re-infection. She repeats this in every interview and at every TV show: everyone should be injected with these "vaccines", but she shouldn't.

Another doctor from Ukraine, Yevhen Dubrovsky, Infectious disease specialist (who successfully treats Covid-19 patients with existing antiviral drugs for almost two years) says and writes that there are no cases of re-infection after recovering. He also says and writes that the human natural immune system is the best protection from Covid-19, and no vaccination needed to those who have already recovered from Covid-19 and that mortality rate from Covid-19 is much lower than 1% and we have no pandemic. Unlike Olga Golubovska he is often not welcomed by TV, since he does not propagate mandatory “vaccination”.

Yevhen Dubrovsky, a part of interview for volynonline.com February 4th, 2021 (my translation from Ukrainian):

“Scientists have recently made an important discovery about the peculiarities of the immunity of a certain group of the population. We are talking about those who do not suffer from COVID-19 despite constant close contact with patients. Each of us saw and communicated with someone from our environment who lived or worked with the sick, but for some reason did not get sick. It turns out that approximately 30% of the population has a sufficient set of specific immune cells, which prevents the disease. Such a person can get sick asymptomatically, or, in most cases, not get COVID-19 at all.

It sounds like a sensation, but there is nothing strange here. Humans have different levels of immunity. There is a first barrier, the so-called innate nonspecific immunity (macrophages, phagocytes, dendritic cells, etc.). It works on the mucous membranes, where the virus enters the body. With a good protection system, this is often enough to keep you from getting sick.

However, the greatest value is T cells - powerful, experienced and reliable guardians of our body. And the sensation is that the researchers found the presence of specific T cells to SARS-COV-2 in donors before infection. Where in the body did these cells come from? From acquaintance with other coronaviruses. This is the so-called cross-immunity. The man once had a coronavirus infection, now protected for a long time from re-infection. Research conducted in Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Sweden and Singapore is gradually accumulating more and more data. Finally, the situation with many patients with almost asymptomatic forms and with those who do not get sick at all becomes clear. The virus mutates, but the immune system does not care. The immune system is able to recognize and prevent both usual and mutated COVID-19.”

It seems that we have a "vaccination" pandemic, but not a coronavirus.

WHOCardiovascularDeath11June2021
WHO_Cancer_Death_2020_copy
WHOCoronavirusDeath27September2021-copy

Note: 4,743,748 deaths in 22 months, not in one year. WHO reported that the first person died of a "bat coronavirus" on November 17, 2019. Then they denied it and said that it was a “pangolin coronavirus”. Then they denied both versions. After 22 months, they still do not know where this virus came from and whether this virus is of animal or human origin. Every new version refutes the previous one; and since they themselves got confused and do not really know anything about this virus, they announced that all information about this virus is classified.

Nevertheless, despite the fact that they do not have a clear understanding of the nature of this virus and do not have any ability to make a real vaccine which should contain weakened or dead virus or certain its part, they have already administered 5,874,934,542 doses of "vaccines" to stop the virus. This is science!

Phases of clinical research

In real medicine, all vaccines, as well as pharmaceuticals, have clear approval protocols. These are the so-called "drug clinical trials". They consist of several stages.

First, preclinical tests are carried out on animals: guinea pigs, lab mice and other susceptible rodents, then on apes.

Then the phase of human clinical trials is organized like this: for a large fee, a very small group of volunteers gathers to demonstrate the safety of the vaccine in humans and its ability to stimulate the production of antibodies.

After the vaccine is proven safe in the first phase of a human clinical trial, it moves to the next phase. As a rule, there are already hundreds of people in this phase. The developers continue to test the safety of the vaccine, and also select the dose and mode of administration of the vaccine preparation - so that the greatest immunogenicity is obtained - that is the strongest production of antibodies without harm to health.

After the second phase has shown safety, and the optimal vaccination scheme has been selected, the third phase of clinical trials begins. At this stage, the vaccine has already been administered to thousands of volunteers, etc.

Also it is commonly known that according to medicine protocol before a full dose of a vaccine is injected, a testing low dose must be administered.

However, with mRNA and Viral Vector "vaccines", everything is completely different. No preclinical testing on animals. Tests are immediately carried out on the cells of aborted human fetuses and on hundreds of millions of living NON-VOLUNTEERS; no low doses, but full doses are injected.

Also, it is commonly known that a vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease. A vaccine typically contains an agent that resembles a disease-causing microorganism and is often made from weakened or killed forms of the microbe, its toxins, or one of its surface proteins. The agent stimulates the body's immune system to recognize the agent as a threat, destroy it, and to further recognize and destroy any of the microorganisms associated with that agent that it may encounter in the future. The administration of vaccines is called vaccination.

However it is already commonly known that mRNA and Viral Vector Covid-19 “vaccines” don’t contain weakened or killed forms of the Coronavirus microbe, or its toxins, or one of its surface proteins.

The injection of these “vaccines” is not a vaccination, but experimental infusion of a dangerous fluid into the body, which acts on the body in a completely different way than a real vaccine. This fact explains why after such a "vaccination" all "vaccinated" can still get infected, be contagious and infect other people, both "vaccinated" and "unvaccinated".

Moreover, the manufacturers of the mRNA Covid-19 "vaccines" themselves and the people who mandatory impose these “vaccines” on us are stating that all "vaccinated" by these “vaccines” are strictly obliged to wear masks, since they still can get infected with COVID-19, can be its transmitters and can infect other people both unvaccinated people and “vaccinated” as well. In other words, they confirm the absolute uselessness and even harmfulness of these "vaccines".

Such a statement alone gives Catholics the right to refuse these "vaccines".

Also, if a “consumer” was to get sick from any mRNA or Viral Vector Covid-19 "vaccine", he or she can't sue the pharmaceutical companies, since these companies are immune from any liability by Law of the U.S. (and Laws of all states over the world as well).

law.cornell.edu
cnbc.com

Sovereignty of men

Sovereignty of every man is limited by rights and duties of one’s state of life and a position in a society.

The sovereignty of all men is restricted by the Natural Law which obliges all men. The sovereignty of all men who have use of reason is restricted by the Positive Divine Law of the New Testament which obliges all men who have use of reason. The sovereignty of all baptized persons who have attained the use of reason is restricted by Ecclesiastical Law which obliges all baptized persons who have attained the use of reason.

Human sovereignty cannot be higher than the Sovereignty of God, and it is a grave sin for human beings to attempt to appropriate for themselves the sovereignty of God.

Based on the teaching of the New Testament, the Catholic Church respects all men's deeds which are in harmony with the Natural Law: "For when the gentiles who have not the law, do by nature those things that are of the law; these having not the law, are a law to themselves" (TO THE ROMANS 2:14)

However the Catholic Church cannot pay respect to manufacturing of “vaccines” that have used “cell lines” derived from aborted fetuses in their research and production process, because such actions are considered as an attempt to put human sovereignty over the Sovereignty of God. Scientists want to be as gods - “you shall be as gods” (GENESIS 3:5). Such research and production process is a revolting action involving the sins against the First and Fifth Commandments.

The Vatican II church’s teaching

On December 21, 2020, “The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith” issued a “Note on the morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines”.

The main idea of this document is following:

“2. In this sense, when ethically irreproachable Covid-19 vaccines are not available (e.g. in countries where vaccines without ethical problems are not made available to physicians and patients, or where their distribution is more difficult due to special storage and transport conditions, or when various types of vaccines are distributed in the same country but health authorities do not allow citizens to choose the vaccine with which to be inoculated) it is morally acceptable to receive Covid-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses in their research and production process.”

Vatican_morality_Covid-19-vaccines-c

The document was ordered for publication by the “Sovereign Pontiff Francis”, and signed by “Luis F. Card. Ladaria, S.I., Prefect” and “S.E. Mons Giacomo Morandi, Titular Archbishop of Cerveteri, Secretary”.

Definitely Catholics should never follow this “Note”, because it contradicts the Natural Law, the Positive Divine Law of the New Testament, particularly the teaching about killing of human fetuses, i.e. abortions and the attitude to the bodies of the dead and living.

Comparing the Catholic Church teaching with the Novus Ordo church teaching

According to Moral Theology it is never lawful directly to kill the innocent. The fetus is an innocent human being, with a human soul which is infused into it by God at the moment of conception and has as much right to live as anyone else.

A MANUAL OF MORAL THEOLOGY,
BY REV. THOMAS SLATER:

"Inasmuch as it is never lawful directly to kill the innocent, it is never lawful directly to procure abortion at a time when there is no probability that the foetus can live outside the mother's womb. This is clear, for the foetus is a human being, with a human soul, which, as is commonly held by theologians, is infused into it by God at the moment of conception; it has, then, as much right to live as anyone else, and it certainly is innocent of all personal crime. To deprive it directly of the medium in which alone it can live is to kill it directly, just as to deprive a man of air by plunging him under water is to kill him directly. The direct procuring of abortion, then, is never allowed, inasmuch as it is the direct killing of the innocent, and intrinsically wrong." [1.1]

CATHOLIC LIBRARY, MORAL SERIES,
BY RODERICK MacEACHEN:

"The child's life begins at the moment of conception. To destroy this life any time thereafter is a heinous crime. It may be but a few moments after conception has taken place. Yet it is a grave sin of homicide. It is the murder of a helpless and innocent victim.
Nor is it necessary to make sure that conception has taken place. It is enough if it could have taken place under the circumstances. To use means to counteract this effect is a grave sin of homicide. The intention is to destroy life if life has come there.
The unborn child is called a foetus. It is often called an embryo until the fifth month. It may be mature or immature. It is mature when it is fully developed. It is then capable of life after birth.
To eject an immature foetus is called abortion. It is brought about by artificial means. These may be drugs or surgical operations. Abortion is a sin of child-murder. It is always a grave sin. Those who procure abortion are excommunicated by the Church" [2]

The Catholic Church, based on the Natural Law and Holy Scripture, treats the human being as a person made in the image of God; his likeness to God is to be found in his soul, which possesses reason and free will.

Unlike the atheistic scientists and the highest Novus Ordo hierarchy, the Catholic Church does not act upon human persons as if we were inanimate objects without intellect.

The Catechism Explained,
Rev. Francis Spirago:

"God does not act upon us as if we were inanimate objects without intellect or free will." (p. 208)
"God made the body of man out of the dust of the earth, and breathed into him a living soul. The soul of man is a spiritual substance…The relations between the body and the soul of man are as follows: the body is the dwelling-place of the soul…The soul also is the life of the body; as soon as the two are parted, the body soon returns to the dust from which it was formed.
...Man is made in the image of God; his likeness to God is to be found in his soul, which possesses reason and free will, and thence has the power of knowing what is beautiful and good, and of loving it...The body of man is not made in the image of God, for God is a pure spirit, but yet the likeness to God stamps itself in some way on the body, as being the instrument of the soul, both in its upright bearing, and in the dominion it exerts over the irrational animals." (pp. 152, 154)
"Christian obsequies are conducted with so much solemnity, because it is well pleasing to God that we should show reverence to the mortal remains of those who have departed this life in the grace of God.
It is becoming to treat the human body with respect after death, for during our lifetime our bodies are sacred, as being the abode and instrument of the soul which is made to God's image. They are also the temple of the Holy Ghost, and to be held in honor for God's sake. Moreover the burial of the dead is a work of mercy which is not without its reward." [3]

The Church teaches that one of works of mercy toward our neighbor is to bury the dead.
After death the human body must return to the dust of earth from which it was formed. The only Catholic practice for the bodies of the dead people is burial in the ground as is written above.

CATHOLIC LIBRARY, MORAL SERIES,
BY RODERICK MacEACHEN:

"Works of mercy may be corporal or spiritual. Seven corporal works of mercy are generally mentioned. They are: To feed the hungry, to give drink to the thirsty, to clothe the naked, to ransom the captive, to harbor the harborless, to visit the sick and to bury the dead." [4]

The Catholic Church about medical science

Speaking about science, the Catholic Church teaches that medical science and knowledge of anatomy is fostered by post-mortem examinations, however corpses must be treated reverently and properly buried.

Moral Theology,
by Rev. HERIBERT JONE:

“An autopsy may be performed for an adequate reason. Thus medical science and knowledge of anatomy is fostered by post-mortem examinations. The dissected corpse must be treated reverently and properly buried.” [5]

Corpses must be treated reverently and properly buried. Neither keeping corpses of the dead fetuses in a freezer for decades nor harvesting fetal cell lines in vaccine research and production process is allowed by the Catholic Moral Theology. All these and other similar practices are of pagan origin.

With regard to infectious diseases, below are a few quotes from Pastoral Medicine by ALEXANDER E. SANFORD, M.D. published in 1905 with the Imprimatur of Bishop JOHN M. FARLEY, Archbishop of New York.

Doctor Sanford explained that immunity is acquired by safely passing through an infectious disease and is furthermore obtained by vaccination. The commonly known example of precautionary vaccination is that by vaccine pox made from a modified and weak germ of smallpox. Also, the injection of the genuine virus – a process termed variolation - was, at that time, frequently used to gain immunity against pox in its graver form. Compulsion, however, seems only justified if the dangers resulting from vaccination are not considerable enough to overbalance the gained immunity from an infectious disease.

The author also wrote that small wounds received by the vaccinated have often led to grave traumatic diseases, especially to erysipelas, and that syphilis and tuberculosis were transferred from one inoculated person to another by vaccination. This was especially observed in a number of cases where syphilis and tuberculosis had been infected in this manner (there were no disposable syringes in those days).

Pastoral Medicine,
A Handbook for the Catholic Clergy,
by ALEXANDER E. SANFORD, M.D.:

"One kind of immunity is acquired by safely passing through an infectious disease. Conquering an attack from cholera, as a rule - not always - affords protection for months or years against a repetition of the attack. A decided immunity for a long period results after one thorough contagion of the body by pox, scarlet fever, measles, spotted typhus, and typhus of the abdomen.
Basing on this experience, many parents expose their children intentionally to a thorough contagion by measles or scarlet fever, at a time when the named infectious diseases prevail in a mild form. By escaping from the light disease a protection is acquired against possible graver forms of the identical disease.
Immunity against infectious diseases is, furthermore, obtained by vaccination. It affords protection, inasmuch as the body is rendered unsusceptible against the respective infectious disease in its grave form, by having been inoculated with a modified and weak germ of the disease and passed through the subsequent lighter form of that disease. The widest known example of precautionary inoculation is that by vaccine pox. Vaccine pox have their origin in the transfer of genuine (human) pox to the udder of cows (while milking), or by vaccination of the animals. An English physician, Edward Jenner, made the discovery, in 1796, that persons that had been vaccinated with the contents of vaccine pox were unsusceptible against contagion by the genuine virus. The injection of the genuine virus – a process termed variolation - was, at that time, frequently used to gain an immunity against pox in its graver form, by passing through the injected disease, which generally was milder than one caused by infection."
"The protective power of inoculation with vaccine matter is certified to by the result of experiments, by Jenner and his contemporaries, on several thousand persons, who were subsequently variolated.
It is, furthermore, proven by exact statistics that during the century reckoned from that date, mortality from pox has been reduced to a minimum in countries where vaccination was made obligatory; whereas, in equally cultured countries, but without compulsory vaccination, the mortality remained stationary.
If vaccination is to benefit the general state of health, it must be made compulsory, else many will shirk vaccination owing to carelessness or prejudice. Compulsion, however, seems only justified if the dangers resulting from vaccination are not considerable enough to overbalance the gained immunity from smallpox."
Experience has shown that heretofore diseased conditions have resulted from vaccination to some extent.
The small wound received by the vaccinated has often led to grave traumatic diseases, especially to erysipelas. Furthermore, it has been found that germs may be transferred from one inoculated person to another by vaccination. Especially was this observed in a number of unfortunate cases where syphilis had been infected in this manner, owing to inattention in vaccinating. That it is possible to transfer tuberculosis in a like manner must also be admitted.
Reckoning with these results of experience, only competent physicians should be permitted to vaccinate, and only with the application of antiseptics. Only the lymph of animals is permissible. Animal lymph is now produced in institutes belonging to the government, and conducted with special precaution. After the lymph is taken from the calf, the animal is slaughtered and thoroughly examined. The vaccine matter taken out is only used if the examination has failed to disclose any traces of tuberculosis or erysipelas. A transport of syphilis is rendered impossible by animal lymph." [6]

Speaking of mRNA and Viral Vector COVID-19 “vaccines”, they are not equal with vaccines made from weakened or killed viruses. The manufacturers say that these “vaccines to prevent coronavirus disease” don’t contain weakened or killed forms of the coronavirus. Moreover, in various stages of these “vaccines” development and manufacturing, cells taken from aborted human fetuses have been used. This may mean that the purpose of injecting these "vaccines" into human bodies is not to prevent coronavirus disease, but something different.

Of course, these "vaccines" cannot be accepted or recommended by the Catholic Church, let alone the mandatory "vaccination" with these "vaccines".

Child sacrifice

Child sacrifice was ritualistic killing of children in order to please or appease a “deity” or "supernatural beings" in order to achieve a desired result. The ritualistic killing of children was a form of human sacrifice. Some pagan nations also used parts of dead babies for “medication”, and some pagans even practiced cannibalism.

By the “Note on the morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines”, “The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith” of the Novus Ordo church encourages similar actions to obtain “mercy” of a “virus” to end “pandemic”. The Congregation encourages immoral experiments with bodies of dead human fetuses and living people.

Although we are not forced to consume human fetuses per-orally, we are forced to consume injections which may contain fetal cells derived from aborted fetuses.

But if these "vaccines" do not contain cells derived from aborted human fetuses is our concern baseless?

An explanation why the cells of aborted fetuses are used for development and manufacturing of some of the COVID-19 "vaccines" can be found on the Official Portal for North Dakota State Government:

COVID-19 Vaccine & Fetal Cell Lines

In various stages of vaccine development and manufacturing, some of the COVID-19 vaccines used cells originally isolated from fetal tissue (often referred to as fetal cells), some of which were originally derived from an aborted fetus.”

"Why are fetal cells used to make vaccines?

Historical fetal cell lines were derived in the 1960’s and 1970’s from two elective abortions and have been used to create vaccines for diseases such as hepatitis A, rubella, and rabies. Abortions from which fetal cells were obtained were elective and were not done for the purpose of vaccine development.

The fetal cell lines being used to produce some of the potential COVID-19 vaccines are from two sources:

- HEK-293: A kidney cell line that was isolated from a fetus in 1973 (undisclosed origin, from either a spontaneous miscarriage or an elective abortion)

- PER.C6: A retinal cell line that was isolated from an aborted fetus in 1985

Any vaccine that relies on these historic cell lines will not require nor solicit new abortions.

To develop and manufacture some vaccines, pharmaceutical companies prefer human cell lines over other cells because 1) viruses need cells to grow and the viruses tend to grow better in cells from humans than animals (because they infect humans), 2) fetal cells can be used longer than other cell types, and 3) fetal cells can be maintained at low temperatures, allowing scientists to continuing using cell lines from decades ago. While fetal cell lines may be used to develop or manufacture COVID-19 vaccines, the vaccines themselves do not contain any aborted fetal cells.

“The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna do not require the use of any fetal cell cultures in order to manufacture (produce) the vaccine.

Early, in the development of mRNA vaccine technology, fetal cells were used for “proof of concept” (to demonstrate how a cell could take up mRNA and produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein) or to characterize the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.”

"The non-replicating viral vector vaccine produced by Johnson & Johnson did require the use of fetal cell cultures, specifically PER.C6, in order to produce and manufacture the vaccine.

At least five conclusions can be drawn from this explanation:

  1. In various stages of “vaccine” development and manufacturing, some of the COVID-19 “vaccines” used cells originally isolated from fetal tissue;
  2. The fetal cell lines being used to produce some of the potential COVID-19 “vaccines”;
  3. Fetal cell lines also have been used to create vaccines for diseases such as hepatitis A, rubella, and rabies;
  4. It looks quite strange to test "vaccines" on the cells of dead human fetuses to understand how these "vaccines" may work in the bodies of living people; a dead body and a living body are not the same, are they?
  5. “Viruses need cells to grow and the viruses tend to grow better in cells from humans than animals” – it is also quite a strange argument, because neither mRNA nor Viral Vector “vaccines” contain SARS CoV-2 (Covid-19) virus.

It is commonly known that hepatitis A, rubella, rabies, adenovirus and other viral infections and tuberculosis are quite dangerous and are widespread throughout the world.

However, only Covid-19 “vaccines” are forcibly imposed on the entire population of the planet under duress and threats. This naturally causes distrust of such compulsory "vaccination", and refusal to accept such “vaccination” is a normal reaction.

As potential “consumers” of these “vaccines” we have the right not to allow our bodies to be poisoned with substances the manufacturing of which is associated with violation of all moral and ethical norms, especially if it is known that the fetal cell lines (a kidney cell line and a retinal cell line) are being used to produce some of these “vaccines”.

Even if these "vaccines" themselves “do not contain” cells derived from aborted human fetuses, Catholics cannot accept them, because their testing and production is carried out through experiments on aborted human fetuses.

Although it is said that “any vaccine that relies on these historic cell lines will not require nor solicit new abortions”, we don’t know whether it is true or not, because we cannot verify how many human embryos were actually killed and how many aborted fetuses were used to produce such “vaccines”. The very idea to use “historic cell lines” of aborted human fetuses is morally unacceptable.

The idea and practice of disrespectful attitude to either aborted fetuses and “vaccine” “consumers” as if they were guinea pigs, is absolutely morally unacceptable as well.

Therefore, the moral duty of Catholics is not to cooperate in the sins of others. Reception of such "vaccines" does involve immoral cooperation either, in abortions whenever they were done, and in dangerous medical experiments with living people as if they were animals.

Is it lawful to mutilate a man?

Self mutilation is allowed only to save one’s life.

Moral Theology,
by Rev. HERIBERT JONE:

Self mutilation is allowed only to save one’s life…Cancer, bloodpoisoning, infection, etc., justify the amputation of a member of the body.” [7]

CASES OF CONSCIENCE
BY REV. THOMAS SLATER, S.J.:

"2. Is it lawful to mutilate a man?
No; except in so far as it is necessary to preserve the man's life, or unless it is commanded by competent authority in punishment of crime, according to the law of the country. Otherwise as man is not the owner of his life or limbs, but the ownership of them belongs to God, man cannot dispose of life or limb, because he cannot dispose of what does not belong to him." [8]

Speaking about aborted human fetuses, we cannot say that they were divided into parts by scientists. However we can say that once abortion done, no scientist has power or ability turning a dead aborted fetus into a living person again; only God has such power and ability. A baby only can be saved in a case of premature birth provided if such baby was born alive. Aborted fetuses don’t belong to scientists who have no right to store them in a freezer as “experimental tissue”. They also have no right to harvest “cell lines” from the dead bodies; it can be considered as a kind of mutilation and a moral perversion.

Aborted fetuses don't belong to authorities as well, and cannot be punished for crime, since THEY ARE INNOCENT.

The ownership of human fetuses either living or dead belongs to God.

Once abortion happened, either directly or indirectly, the only morally and ethically good action can be done for aborted human fetus - to bury the dead.

Some considerations on the “Note on the morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines” by the Novus Ordo churh

It is clear that “The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith” of the Novus Ordo church encourages and justifies immoral ideas and practices such as:

  • Using of human aborted fetuses for research and productions of “vaccines”;
  • Treating the human aborted fetuses as a piece of meat at a freezer;
  • Treating all living persons as guinea pigs or a lab mouse;
  • Injections of the “vaccines” associated with cells of aborted fetuses into bodies of living people.

A growing number of Catholics hold that the "Vatican II Council" (1962-1965) set up a parallel, counterfeit Novus Ordo church which does not represent the Catholic Church. This Novus Ordo church is rapidly sinking into liturgical, doctrinal and moral abyss. The “Note on the morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines” by "The Congregation for the Doctrine of The Faith" is clear evidence of the deep moral fall of the Novus Ordo church; this “Note” has nothing to do with Catholic doctrine.

Highest hierarchs of the Novus Ordo church say that there is no alternative to using aborted fetuses in the process of making "vaccines".

However, Holy Scripture and the Catholic Church say that the end does not justify the means. (cf. TO ROMANS 3:8)

A MANUAL OF MORAL THEOLOGY,
By REV. THOMAS SLATER:

"A good intention certainly cannot make a bad action good…Evil must not be done that good may come of it. This is the teaching of Holy Scripture and of the Catholic Church.” [9]

Therefore, based on the Natural Law and the Holy Bible the Author of which is God, on Holy Tradition of the Catholic Church and right reason, following one’s conscience, Catholics DO have the right to not accept in good faith any “vaccines” that have used "fetal cell lines" from aborted fetuses in their research and production process.

Catholics also have every right to refuse AND NOT ACCEPT the mRNA or Viral Vector "vaccines", WHERE testing was carried out with gross violations of the approval protocols.

My bishop says that he “entirely rejects this false vaccine," and teaches that "it is a mortal sin knowingly to receive it. One would participate in a potentially mortal experiment without any justifying reason. Human beings are not experiment animals, although the Masters treat us so”.

Recommended article:

A Simple Advisory Regarding the New mRNA Coronavirus Vaccine By Rev. Stephen McKenna (Research Consultation provided by: Dr. Daniel Stanislowski, Ph. D. who has a doctorate in Molecular Biology and Bio-Chemistry)

Fr. Valerii

P.S.

CATHOLIC MORAL TEACHING AND ITS ANTAGONISTS,
BY JOSEPH MAUSBACH, D.D.:

"The moral ideas of Christianity are spiritually living forces, revealing their full value in their effect upon the mind of man and upon the history of mankind. While they remain ever the same, they may be clothed in various forms, according to the needs and capabilities of men in different ages. In his brief to the bishops of Italy, issued at Pentecost, 1905, our late Holy Father, Pius X, said: The Church has at all times clearly shown that she possesses the admirable power of adapting herself to the changing conditions of society; so that, whilst preserving faith and morals in their integrity, she easily assimilates herself to all the unessential and accidental circumstances belonging to various stages of civilization and to the new requirements of human society."

Such moral law, a "word of everlasting life," is contained in our Lord's plain and dignified command to "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." Of the Jews was required obedience to the Emperor, a foreign pagan sovereign whose rule was most distasteful to their national pride. They were ordered to obey Tiberius, a wicked, cruel tyrant, for whom not even the Romans could feel any respect, and they were to obey him not simply under compulsion, but "for conscience sake." (1) This obedience was not, however, to involve the sacrifice of conscience itself: "Render to God the things that are God's." A limit is assigned to the secular power, and thenceforth the State ceased to be an embodiment of the deity. There is a sphere of human action over which decrees of the Senate and imperial orders have no control. A subject is no longer a slave; in what constitutes the true dignity of his personality he is free and responsible to God alone. Henceforth we belong to a kingdom "not of this world"; we are citizens of the heavenly Jerusalem, where the Eternal is king. And this kingdom, too, has its permanent and visible organization on earth, an organization embracing all the world: "Going, therefore, teach ye all nations, baptizing them and teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you."
(1) Rom. xiii. 5 [10]

Sources:

[1] THE GREAT ENCYCLICAL LETTERS OF POPE LEO XIII. TRANSLATIONS FROM APPROVED SOURCES. WITH PREFACE BY Rev. JOHN J. WYNNE, S.J., New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: BENZIGER BROTHERS, Printed in the United States of America, Nihil Obstat: REMIGIUS LAFORT, S.T.L., Censor Librorum, Imprimatur: +JNO. M. FARLEY, Archbishop of New York, NEW YORK, August 4, 1908, pp.135, 160-161

[1.1] A MANUAL OF MORAL THEOLOGY, FOR ENGLISH SPEAKING COUNTRIES BY REV. THOMAS SLATER, SJ. VOL I., FIFTH AND REVISED EDITION, LONDON, BURNS OATES & WASHBOURNE LTD. PUBLISHERS TO THE HOLY SEE, 1925, NIHIL OBSTAT: H. DAVIS, SJ., IMPRIMI POTEST: GULIELMUS BODKIN, SJ., Censor deputatus, IMPRIMATUR: EDM. CAN. SURMONT, Vicarius generalis. WESTMONASTERII, Die 1 Decembris, 1924. p. 201

[2] CATHOLIC LIBRARY, MORAL SERIES, BY RODERICK MacEACHEN, Priest of Columbus Diocese, Commandments of God, Volume III, PUBUSHED BY CATHOLIC BOOK COMPANY, WHEELING, W. VA., 1916, Nihil Obstat: WILLIAM HALL, Censor Deputatus, Imprimatur: P. J. DONAHUE, D. D., Bishop of Wheeling, pp. 104-105

[3] The Catechism Explained, From the original of Rev. Francis Spirago, Professor of Theology, Edited by Rev. Richard F. Clarke, S.J. New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: BENZIGER BROTHERS, Printers to the Holy Apostolic See, 1899. Nihil Obstat: Thos. L. Kinkead, Censor Librorum, Imprimatur: + MICHAEL AUGUSTINE, Archbishop of New York, New York, August 8, 1899, pp. 152, 154, 208, 701

[4] CATHOLIC LIBRARY, MORAL SERIES, BY RODERICK MacEACHEN, Priest of Columbus Diocese, Precepts, First Commandment, Volume II, PUBUSHED BY CATHOLIC BOOK COMPANY, WHEELING, W. VA., 1916, Nihil Obstat: WILLIAM HALL, Censor Deputatus, Imprimatur: P. J. DONAHUE, D. D., Bishop of Wheeling, p. 80

[5] Moral Theology, by Rev. HERIBERT JONE, O.F.M. CAP., J.C.D., by Rev. URBAN ADELMAN, O.F.M. CAP., J.C.D., THE MERCIER PRESS LIMITED, CORK, IRELAND, Nihil Obstat: PIUS KAELIN, O.F.M. CAP, Censor Deputatus, Imprimi Potest: VICTOR GREEN, O.F.M. CAP., Provincial, July 2, 1955, Nihil Obstat: RICHARD GINDER, S.T.I., Censor Librorum, Imprimatur: JOHN FRANCIS DEARDEN, D.D., Bishop of Pittsburg, August 15, 1955, Printed in the United states of America, p. 135

[6] Pastoral Medicine, A Handbook for the Catholic Clergy, by ALEXANDER E. SANFORD, M.D., NEW EDITION REVISED, AND ENLARGED BY A CHAPTER ON THE MOMENT OF DEATH, BY THE REV. WALTER M. DRUM, SJ., AND BY CHAPTERS ON "THE FIFTH COMMANDMENT" AND " NEURASTHENIA IN ITS PASTORAL PSYCHIATRIC ASPECTS", NEW YORK, JOSEPH F. WAGNER, Nihil Obstat: REMIGIUS LAFORT, S.T.L. Censor Librorum, Imprimatur: +JOHN M. FARLEY, D.D. Archbishop of New York, NEW YORK, November 17, 1905, pp. 112-114

[7] Moral Theology, by Rev. HERIBERT JONE, O.F.M. CAP., J.C.D., by Rev. URBAN ADELMAN, O.F.M. CAP., J.C.D., THE MERCIER PRESS LIMITED, CORK, IRELAND, Nihil Obstat: PIUS KAELIN, O.F.M. CAP, Censor Deputatus, Imprimi Potest: VICTOR GREEN, O.F.M. CAP., Provincial, July 2, 1955, Nihil Obstat: RICHARD GINDER, S.T.I., Censor Librorum, Imprimatur: JOHN FRANCIS DEARDEN, D.D., Bishop of Pittsburg, August 15, 1955, Printed in the United states of America, p. 135

[8] CASES OF CONSCIENCE FOR ENGLISH-SPEAKING COUNTRIES, BY REV. THOMAS SLATER, S.J., VOLUME I, NEW YORK, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO, BENZIGER BROTHERS, 1911, Permissu Superiorum: JOSEPH BROWNE, S.J., Praep. Prov. Anglicae, Nihil Obstat: REMY LAFORT, Censor Librorum, Imprimatur: +JOHN M. FARLEY, Archbishop of New York, NEW YORK, November 22, 1910, p. 233

[9] A MANUAL OF MORAL THEOLOGY, For English Speaking Countries, By REV. THOMAS SLATER, SJ., VOL I., FIFTH AND REVISED EDITION, LONDON, BURNS OATES & WASHBOURNE LTD., PUBLISHERS TO THE HOLY SEE, 1925, NIHIL OBSTAT: H. DAVIS, SJ., IMPRIMI POTEST: GULIELMUS BODKIN, SJ., NIHIL OBSTAT: J. R. McKEE, C.O., Censor deputatus, MPRIMATUR: EDM. CAN. SURMONT, Vicarius generalis., WESTMONASTERII, Die 1 Decembris, 1924, p. 24-25

[10] CATHOLIC MORAL TEACHING AND ITS ANTAGONISTS, BY JOSEPH MAUSBACH, D.D. PROFESSOR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MUNSTER, TRANSLATED FROM THE SIXTH REVISED AND AUGMENTED GERMAN EDITION By A. M. BUCHANAN, M.A. (London), NEW YORK, JOSEPH F. WAGNER, Nihil Obstat: REMIGIUS LAFORT, D.D., Censor, Imprimatur: JOHN CARDINAL FARLEY, Archbishop of New York, New York, November 12, 1914, pp. 338-339

Категорія: Articles in English | Переглядів: 138 | Додав: